To receive any Members' questions.
Minutes:
Question 1
Cllr George Williams to ask Cllr Vicky Glover-Ward, the Executive Member for Planning and Growth
Given the protections for nesting birds under the wildlife and countryside act, do the council and its providers have a responsibility and the powers to postpone or decline planning applications for non-urgent roofing works in known swift nesting sites?
Response from Councillor Glover-Ward
Thank you for the question as I am keen to protect swifts and have four swift boxes on my property. As such I am aware of the issues around swift nesting areas in roofs and I know that swifts tend to nest in the same place for life. As such I share the concerns raised by Cllr Williams.
Unfortunately, the planning system allows a great deal of building work to take place without the need for planning permission. This is referred to as ‘Permitted Development’ and there are currently no exemptions included in the General Permitted Development Order 2015 which relate to the presence of swifts.
Of course, under the Wildlife and Countryside Act disturbing nesting birds is an offence and so if there is evidence of nests in use when work is about to take place then no works should be undertaken.
I have already been approached by the Hertford Swift Group who have volunteered to draft a suggested swift policy for the Council’s consideration. I understand that this will cover both existing nesting sites and to provide additional sites in new builds and refurbishments of properties. This will then be presented for inclusion in due course in the update of the District Plan, should this be approved in our motion later on this evening.
In the meantime, the Council will continue to encourage the inclusion of nest boxes in accordance with the Council’s Sustainability Supplementary Planning Document. Consideration will also be given to the production of a Swift Best Practice Advice Note.
I
welcome the input from community organisations such as Hertford
Swift Group, Herts North East Herts Swift Group and Ware Swift
Group who are doing such incredibly important work to save this red
listed species whose numbers have declined by over 50% in the last
20 years (RSPB figures) due to, amongst other things, habitat loss.
The groups have been steadily increasing the number of installed
swift boxes in existing properties and I hope this invaluable work
will result in an increase in swift numbers as they start to
recover locally.
There was no supplementary question.
Question 2
Cllr Diane Hollebon to ask Cllr Vicky Glover-Ward, the Executive Member for Planning and Growth
Can the Executive Member for Planning and Growth confirm to me that she is aware that the proposed community centre in the St James’s Park development, Bishop’s Stortford South, is being offered on a 100-year lease hold basis when it’s being funded by Section 106 funds and should therefore be a community asset in perpetuity. Who allowed this and why?
Response from Councillor Glover-Ward
I would like to thank Councillor Hollebon for her question.
Firstly, I would like to make it clear that there was never a
requirement to build a community centre as part of this project;
the requirement is to provide up to 200m2 of community space
within the Local Centre under the S106 agreement. This Community
Space is required to be designed in accordance with the Community
Space Management Strategy with the management and maintenance of
same along with the management body details included in the
'Management Strategy’.
It is not uncommon for community space to be included in another building, as is the case here, and therefore a long leasehold agreement in this circumstance is not unreasonable. It’s probably worth noting that there is no planning policy requirement that community space should be offered in perpetuity to any local council and I understand that currently it is anticipated that this space will be run by a non-council body although this may alter dependent on progress made by the developer to secure a lease agreement with an appropriate body.
I am sure that the Councillor will agree that the likely term of 100 years on the lease, which may also be extended or renewed at the end of the term as with any lease, does offer a substantial degree of permanence.
There is a working draft of the Community Space Management Strategy and Specificationsubmitted to EHDC planners for comment and we would anticipate that a more formal draft will be submitted subsequently where councillors and the public will be able to comment.
Supplementary question from Councillor Hollebon
Councillor Hollebon asked if the Executive Member could guarantee that relevant ward members were made aware and consulted on any agreement before Officers made a decision regarding the provision of community centres? She said that residents needed a community asset for their health and wellbeing.
Response from Councillor Glover-Ward
Councillor Glover-Ward said if the council were providing a community centre she would take that on board but the council was providing community space under this S106 decision and that was why it was leasehold, not freehold.
Question 3
Cllr Joe Thomas to ask Cllr Sarah Hopewell, the Executive Member for Wellbeing
What steps are East Herts District Council taking to mitigate the risk of injury from lightning strikes in our facilities and open spaces?
Response from Councillor Hopewell
I
would like to thank Councillor Thomas for his question.
In
fact, my colleague Councillor Dumont has already raised a similar
question with officers following the terrible recent lightning
strike at Sele School in Hertford. In this case members may be
aware that as we understand it, the tournament had been suspended
at the school and the playing field was being cleared when the
storm gathered pace and unfortunately the boy was struck.
Education is critical to mitigating injury. East Herts takes all
reasonably practicable steps concerning weather events and activity
management if reports of storm weather are received. Added to this,
we already provide information on our website regarding coping with
cold weather, heat waves and floods and so, in response, to the
recent incident, and so we will be adding a link to the Met
Office’s guidance for staying safe in thunder and lightning
which we will share with the various community groups and partners
we work with.
Whilst it is difficult to plan for every eventually concerning natural phenomena, defibrillators can be vital if someone has a cardiac incident for whatever reason. Over recent years we have funded defibrillators at our own sites such as Wallfields and the Theatre in Hertford and Navigation House in Bishop’s Stortford. All of these are registered on both The Circuit, a highly respected national database of defibrillator locations funded by the NHS, the British Heart Foundation, the Resuscitation Council UK and St John Ambulance, and the online National Defibrillator Database, operated by the Community Heartbeat Trust charity.
In
addition, there are defibrillators located at Hartham, Grange
Paddocks, Leventhorpe, Ward Freman and Fanshawe leisure centres and
swimming pools.
Of particular note, all schools in the district have been part of a roll out programme to ensure access to defibrillators. State-funded primary, secondary and special schools in England that do not have existing provision in place are eligible, with larger schools having been provided with two or more defibrillators so they can be strategically placed in areas where a cardiac arrest may be more likely, such as sports halls.
Timely access to a defibrillator can greatly improve survival
rates following a cardiac incident and members may wish to look at
the National Defibrillator Database at www.nddb.uk
as the searchable map shows the significant number
of defibrillators across our district.
There was no supplementary question.
Supporting documents: