To receive any public questions.
Minutes:
Charlotte Lipscomb to ask Cllr Vicky Glover-Ward, the Executive Member for Member for Planning and Growth
The AMA festival took place at The Silver Leys Polo Club in Bury Green on Saturday 2nd September, having been granted a licence by East Herts Council at a hearing on 14th August. The festival left a trail of disruption in its wake, affecting all our local roads through Bury Green and our neighbouring hamlets and blocked the designated route for emergency vehicles. Local residents experienced not only gridlocked traffic which left us trapped in our homes but also indiscriminate parking on roads and verges, along with issues related to noise, litter, and anti-social behaviour.
Residents endured a weekend of mayhem. Examples include an eighty four year old resident directing traffic in order to try and mitigate the gridlock, a 93 year old man terrified in his house and surrounded by festival goers trying to retrieve abandoned vehicles, an elderly and confused lady in her last weeks of life who was moved to residential care for 2 weeks in anticipation of the event and children aged 10 and 12 too terrified to pick blackberries on the green, even with adult supervision. Young and old were profoundly and adversely affected.
Can the Executive Member responsible for licensing please explain how the decision was made to allow the festival to take place, despite the strong objections from residents, the parish Council, our local councillor, the County Council Highways Dept and the police, all of whom were all able to accurately foresee the havoc the festival would create.
Response
from Councillor Glover-Ward
I
would like to thank Charlotte Lipscomb for raising this important
question about the recent AMA Fest event.
First, I’d like to assure everyone that the council has
followed the right process when considering the AMA Fest
application. While I have responsibility for licensing policies,
the national legislation and guidance does not allow me, as an
Executive member, to be involved in decisions on individual
applications. So, because there were representations against
the application, a hearing led by a sub-committee of the
council’s Licensing Committee was convened. Please do not
think I am trying to distance myself from the sub-committee’s
decision to grant the licence; I am simply pointing out that if the
council had failed to follow the processes set out in law, we could
have been taken to court for incorrectly dealing with the
application.
That said, I have spoken with my colleague, the Chair of the Licensing Committee, and I am very happy to explain the council’s position.
The Licensing Act 2003 dictates the broad range of issues the
council must take into account when deciding whether to issue a
licence for an event. When looking at the AMA Fest application,
just like the five local residents, the local parish council, the
police and others who raised objections, East Herts Council had
considerable concerns about the traffic and parking arrangements
put forward.
The organisers gave assurances both in writing and verbally at
the Licensing Sub-Committee hearing that adequate arrangements
would be put in place but, of course, the council did not simply
take the organiser’s word at face value. So, the
sub-committee stipulated that the event could only go ahead
if the organisers demonstrated the robustness of their plans
by gaining, at their own expense, a Temporary Traffic Regulation
Order (a TTRO) from the Highways team at Hertfordshire County
Council.
The organisers made the application and, although the notice
period for submitting this was far shorter than usual,
Hertfordshire County Council felt able to issue the TTRO. To be
absolutely clear, had the county council not issued the
TTRO, the conditions placed on the licence by East Herts Council
would not have been met and so the East Herts Council would have
been enabled to halt the festival before it had even begun; this
action would have been taken irrespective of the number of tickets
that had been sold and entertainment arranged.
Unfortunately, the day of the festival saw very considerable
disruption on the roads just as Ms Lipscombe has described and East
Herts Council immediately launched an investigation. This includes
looking at what information the organisers provided in support of
their TTRO application to the county council and how this compared
with the actual traffic management arrangements they put in place.
Until we have concluded the investigation we are unable to comment
on the details as this might prejudice any potential action that
the council may deem appropriate.
Please be assured, however, that East Herts Council is ready to
take action against any event organiser that commits offences under
the Licensing Act 2003 which may include not complying with the
terms of a licence. Regarding AMA Fest, we have gathered
information and data from various sources, all of which has now
been reviewed but we agreed to a request from Little Hadham Parish
Council to hold off completing our investigation until local
residents had time to respond to a request for evidence published
in the October edition of the parish council magazine. As we are
striving to be a listening council and in the spirit of partnership
we respect the parish council’s wish to enable as many
residents as possible to have their say.
Finally, just as we must follow the legal processes when considering granting a licence, we must do the same when considering taking action after an event. We will weigh all the evidence received, including the information that may come in as a result of the Parish Council appeal, against the Licensing Act 2003 and the public interest to determine the appropriate action to take in relation to AMA Fest and its organisers.
Supplementary question from Charlotte Lipscombe
The terms of the licence restricted the number of attendees to 5,000 and tickets were on sale long before the hearing in August. She asked the Executive Member if the council knew how many tickets were sold or how the number of attendees at the event was controlled.
Response from Councillor Glover-Ward
Councillor Glover-Ward said she could not comment on this specific point as it was part of the investigation.
Supporting documents: