Agenda and minutes

To receive apologies for absence.

Apologies for absence were submitted from Councillors R Buckmaster, V Burt, R Carter and S Copley. It was noted that Councillor M Connolly was substituting for Councillor R Carter and Councillor M Adams was substituting for Councillor S Copley.

The Chairman welcomed and introduced the Officers present at the meeting. There were no Chairman’s announcements.

To receive any Members' declarations of interest.

Councillor Connolly declared a personal interest in outline application 3/19/0790/OUT, on the grounds that she was a Member of Hertford Town Council, and she had been present at a meeting in September 2023 when Archers Spring was discussed. She had commented on the application at that meeting, but this had not influenced her in the determination of this application today.

To confirm the Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on Wednesday 7 February 2024.

Councillor Devonshire proposed and Councillor Stowe, a motion that the Minutes of the meeting held on 7 February 2024 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman, subject to the addition to condition 13 in respect of details to be submitted regarding bin locations.

After being put to the meeting and a vote taken, the motion was declared CARRIED.

RESOLVED – that the Minutes of the meeting held on 7 February 2024, be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman, subject to the addition to condition 13 in respect of details to be submitted regarding bin locations.

The Chairman advised that at 3:30 pm this afternoon, Democratic Services had received an email from the applicant’s agent in relation to Mr Springer and Mr Parr jointly addressing the committee for 6 minutes regarding outline application 3/19/0790/OUT.

As per the Council constitution, paragraph 6.4.2 sets out that all speaking requests must be made by 5pm two working days prior to the meeting.

Then Chairman said that under the constitution, the committee can depart as it sees fit from the speaking arrangements on certain applications, in accordance with paragraph 6.4.5 of the constitution. The committee could agree to depart from the speaking arrangements and would need to vote on this.

Councillor Estop proposed and Councillor Connolly Hill seconded, a motion that in accordance with paragraph 6.4.5 of the constitution, the committee agree to depart from the speaking arrangements of the Development Management Committee, to allow Mr Springer and Mr Parr to jointly address the committee for 6 minutes regarding outline application 3/19/0790/OUT.

After being put to the meeting and a vote taken, the motion was declared CARRIED.

RESOLVED – that in accordance with paragraph 6.4.5 of the constitution, the committee agree to depart from the speaking arrangements of the Development Management Committee, to allow Mr Springer and Mr Parr to jointly address the committee for 6 minutes in respect of outline application 3/19/0790/OUT.

The Head of Planning and Building Control recommended that in respect of outline application 3/19/0790/OUT, outline planning permission be granted subject to the conditions set out at the end of the report.

The planning case officer set out details of the outline application and summarised in detail the heads of terms of the section 106 legal agreement. He said that access and scale were to be determined only as part of this application, and layout, appearance and landscaping were reserved for future determination.

Mr Leaf and Mr Mitchell addressed the committee in objection to the application. Mr Springer addressed the Committee as the applicant’s agent. Councillor Clements addressed the committee as the local ward Member.

At 7:45 pm, Councillor Watson proposed and Councillor Hill seconded, a motion for an adjournment for 5 minutes to facilitate the remote attendance of an Officer from Hertfordshire County Council highways. After being put to the meeting and a vote taken, this motion was declared CARRIED.

RESOLVED – that the meeting be adjourned for 5 minutes to facilitate the remote attendance of an Officer from Hertfordshire County Council highways.

Mr Armstrong addressed the Committee from Hertfordshire County Council and answered questions from Members. Planning Officers and the Section 106 Officer answered questions from the Committee.

Councillor Stowe proposed and Councillor Hill seconded, a motion that outline application 3/19/0790/OUT be granted planning permission, subject to a section 106 legal agreement and subject to the conditions set out at the end of the report and subject to the following additions to conditions:

·               Pedestrian crossings will be constructed.

·               Works be carried out and completed in respect of bus stops (conditions 15 and 17).

·               Condition  ...  view the full minutes text for item 380.

Recommended for Approval

The Head of Planning and Building Control recommended that in respect of application 3/23/0681/FUL, planning permission be granted subject to the conditions set out at the end of the report.

The planning case officer set out details of the application. Mr Firth addressed the committee as the applicant’s agent. Planning Officers and the Section 106 Officer answered questions from the committee.

The Committee Support Officer reminded the Chairman of paragraphs 3.16 and 3.17 of the council procedure rules and the need to resolve to continue the meeting beyond 10 pm.

Councillor Watson proposed and Councillor Devonshire seconded, a motion that application 3/23/0681/FUL be granted planning permission, subject to the satisfactory conclusion of a section 106 legal agreement and subject to the conditions set out at the end of the report and subject to the following amendments to conditions:

·               Stopping up the existing access

·               Condition 14 being less deterring.

After being put to the meeting and a vote taken, the motion was declared CARRIED.

RESOLVED – that application 3/23/0681/FUL be granted planning permission, subject to the satisfactory conclusion of a section 106 legal agreement and subject to conditions set out at the end of the report and subject to the following amendments to conditions:

·               Stopping up the existing access

·               Condition 14 being less deterring.

(A)  Appeals against refusal of Planning Permission/ non?determination.

(B)  Planning Appeals Lodged.

(C)      Planning Appeals: Inquiry and Informal Hearing Dates.

(D)     Planning Statistics.

RESOLVED – that the following reports be noted:

(A)   Appeals against refusal of planning permission / non-determination;

(B)        Planning Appeals lodged;

(C)        Planning Appeals: Inquiry and Informal Hearing Dates; and

(D)       Planning Statistics.

To consider such other business as, in the opinion of the Chairman of the meeting, is of sufficient urgency to warrant consideration and is not likely to involve the disclosure of exempt information.

There was no urgent business.