588 2010/11 Estimates and Future Targets PDF 76 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
RESOLVED –that:
(A) the estimates for 2010/11 be noted;
(B) the refined list of performance indicators to be retained and deleted, as set out at paragraph 1.7 of the report, be approved;
(C) no further resources should be invested to improve the potential 2010/11 outturn position in order to meet current targets; (Paragraph 3.3, 3.4 and 4.2);
(D) the targets set out in paragraph 5.1 – 5.3 to either improve, reduce or retain performance, be approved;
(E) the adoption of the new local measures set out in paragraph 6.1 of the report, be approved;
(F) the data quality spot checks that are currently being undertaken in paragraph 7.3 of the report be noted;
(G) unit cost indicators are not included in the list of PI estimates and targets (Paragraph 8.1 of the report);
(H) the changes to the 2009/10 performance outturns for the leisure performance indicators (Paragraph 9.1 to 9.3) be noted.
Minutes:
The Joint Scrutiny Committees on 15 February 2010, had made a number of comments as detailed in the “Issues Arising from Scrutiny” report.
Members raised the question of whether the target for employing people with disabilities and from black and ethnic minorities reflected the population of East Herts. They were assured that this was the case.
The use of empty homes in the District rather than new builds and the resource needed for that was raised by Members.
The Executive approved the proposals as now detailed.
RESOLVED – that (A) the estimates for 2010/11 be noted;
(B) the refined list of performance indicators to be retained and deleted, as set out at paragraph 1.7 of the report submitted, be approved;
(C) in respect of targets detailed at paragraphs 3.3, 3.4 and 4.2 of the report submitted, no further resources should be invested to improve the potential 2010/11 outturn position in order to meet current targets;
(D) the targets set out in paragraph 5.1 – 5.3 to either improve, reduce or retain performance, be approved;
(E) the adoption of the new local measures set out in paragraph 6.1 of the report, be approved;
(F) the data quality spot checks that are currently being undertaken in paragraph 7.3 of the report be noted;
(G) unit cost indicators are not included in the list of PI estimates and targets as detailed at paragraph 8.1 of the report; and
(H) the changes to the 2009/10 performance outturns for the leisure performance indicators, as detailed at paragraphs 9.1 to 9.3 of the report be noted.