Venue: Room 28, Wallfields, Hertford. View directions
Contact: Lorraine Blackburn (01279) 502172
No. | Item |
---|---|
Appointment of Vice Chairman Minutes: The Chairman sought nominations for the appointment of a Vice Chairman. It was moved by Councillor N Wilson and seconded by Councillor D Hone, that Councillor J O Ranger be appointed as Vice Chairman for the Civic Year. RESOLVED – that Councillor J O Ranger be appointed as Vice Chairman for the Civic Year 2011/12.
|
|
Chairman's Announcements Minutes:
The Chairman sought nominations for the appointment of a Vice Chairman. It was moved by Councillor N Wilson and seconded by Councillor D Hone, that Councillor J Ranger be appointed as Vice Chairman for the Civic Year.
RESOLVED – that Councillor J O Ranger be appointed as Vice Chairman for the Civic Year 2011/12.
|
|
To receive the minutes of the meeting held on 12 January 2011. Minutes:
RESOLVED – that the Minutes of the Human Resources Committee meeting held on 12 January 2011 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.
|
|
Human Resources Quarterly Performance Report - May 2011 PDF 26 KB Additional documents: Minutes:
Updates were provide in relation to:-
· Resourcing; · Learning and Development · Policies · Equalities and Diversity · C3W Delivery · Cycle to Work Scheme
The Chairman referred to the issue of car parking and whether those matters relating to staff remaining at Bishop’s Stortford could also be addressed. He referred to the “Pool Car” arrangement in operation at the County Council. The Head of People and Organisational Services explained that these matters would be considered by the “Green Policy Group”. She said that she would discuss the car sharing initiative with the Environmental co-ordinator.
In response to a query from Councillor P Ballam regarding the Cycle to Work Scheme, the Head of People and Organisational Services provided an explanation of how the Government supported scheme worked and the Council’s role.
Councillor P Ruffles referred to Equalities and Diversity initiatives and stated that there were problems in East Hertfordshire in relation to loneliness and isolation and how these issues were difficult to address when there was no community to help. He referred to the established Polish and Portuguese communities in the area. He questioned what could be done to communicate with these groups. The Chairman referred to the useful information contained in Ward Profiles. He acknowledged that there were issues around rural isolation, but felt that these were centred around transport and of the difficulties this might cause in relation to accessing jobs. The Chief Executive explained that the Council worked via the CVS (Community Voluntary Service) and a range of groups to address issues including isolation and on areas of specific concern.
Councillor J Ranger was concerned about the return rate of performance reviews (73%) and the objectives set (67%) adding that this figure should be in the 90s. The Head of People and Organisational Services explained that in 2009/10, this figure had been in the 90s, but had dipped last year adding that this was around the time of the review of the Terms and Conditions. The HR team continued to push managers for this information. Councillor J Ranger stated that staff should see the value in the PDR process and be proactive in its application and manage themselves. He suggested that if staff should see the benefit of the process supported by a demanding culture, then this might create a change in mindset.
Councillor N Wilson queried whether this low return was attributable to a lack of motivation in the public sector. The Chairman referred to the Revenues and Benefits return of PDRS which stood at 94.7%. The Head of People and Organisational Services stated that Officers were endeavouring to embed this view within policies and the culture. She explained that there were staff who insisted that that ... view the full minutes text for item 58. |
|
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Head of People and Organisational Services explained that the probationary period could be extended in exceptional circumstances e.g. for dealing with performance issues or training purposes. In response to a query by Councillor J Ranger about the impact the new policy might have for the HR team, the Head of People and Organisational Services confirmed that she did not foresee HR Officers becoming involved in every meeting involving a performance issue as this would be managed by the Head of Service. The situation would be monitored and HR would become involved where necessary.
In response to a query from Councillor P Ballam regarding how the policy might affect probationary staff with a serious illness, the Head of People and Organisational Services stated that these matters would be considered in the context of a review of the policy. Councillor N Wilson stated that incidents such as a serious accident might impact on a member of staff’s performance and this needed to be given due consideration.
Councillor J Ranger referred to Essential Reference Paper “C” attached to the report now submitted and suggested that under Key Objectives the word “development” be amended to “consideration”. This was supported.
Members approved the Probationary Policy as amended.
RESOLVED – that the Probationary Policy, as amended be approved.
|
|
Additional documents: Minutes:
The Chairman referred to the need to keep in touch with members of staff who were on external secondments and of issues around training. The Chief Executive suggested that paragraph 5.2.1 be amended by the deletion of the words “Local Government Organisation” and the insertion of “Public Sector Organisation”. These issues were supported.
The Head of People and Organisational Services explained the PDR process and how it aimed to provide a basis for managing an individual’s career prospects and how this might link in to external secondments. Councillor J Ranger confirmed that many large organisations were increasingly using secondments in the current economic climate, rather than lose key staff, as this widened their knowledge and was of benefit to both the employee and employer. The Chief Executive confirmed that there was liaison on secondment possibilities between Chief Executives.
In response to a query by Councillor J O Ranger on the Council’s view of employees being seconded to voluntary bodies, particularly in the light of the fact that some voluntary bodies were taking on some of the services provided by Local Authorities, the Head of People and Organisational Services confirmed that no member of staff had taken an external secondment to a voluntary body. The Chief Executive explained that a business case would have to be developed on how this would benefit the Council.
In response to a query from Councillor P Ruffles regarding UNISON’s view of secondments elsewhere, the Chief Executive confirmed that it would be for UNISON to determine but usually they had looked at secondments favourably.
The Chairman suggested that the Employees / Secondees’ responsibilities, paragraph 7.3 should be amended to reflect that the onus was on them to keep in touch with the Council. This was supported.
Councillor J Ranger referred to the increasing use of mentoring throughout the SE Region and suggested that this was something that the Council might wish to think about. The Head of People and Organisational Services confirmed that the Council did carry out a lot of informal mentoring adding that a report would be submitted to Human Resources Committee at some future point on this issue.
Members approved the Secondment Policy as amended.
RESOLVED – that (A) the Second Policy as amended be approved;
(B)
paragraph 5.2.1 be amended by the deletion of “Local
Government” and the insertion of “Public
Sector”; |
|
Local Joint Panel - Minutes of the meetings held on 19 January 2011 and 15 March 2011 PDF 37 KB Additional documents: Minutes: Members noted the Minutes of the Local Joint Panel meeting held on 19 January and 15 March 2011.
RESOLVED – that the minutes of the Local Joint Panel meetings held on 19 January and 15 March 2011 be noted.
|