Issue - meetings

Mead Lane Urban Design Framework

Meeting: 17/12/2014 - Council (Item 424)

Mead Lane Urban Design Framework

Minute 317 refers

Additional documents:

Minutes:

RESOLVED – that (A) the issues raised during the public consultation on the draft Mead Lane Urban Design Framework, together with the Officer responses, be agreed;

 

(B)      in light of the responses received, the suggested amendments to the document be agreed; and

 

(C)      the Mead Lane Urban Design Framework be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document to the East Herts Local Plan, Second Review, April 2007 (Saved Policies).

 

(see also Minute 420)


Meeting: 04/11/2014 - Executive (Item 317)

Mead Lane Urban Design Framework

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Executive considered and supported the recommendations of the District Planning Executive Panel meeting held on 22 October 2014, on the draft Mead Lane Urban Design Framework.

 

RECOMMENDED – that (A) the issues raised during the public consultation on the draft Mead Lane Urban Design Framework, together with the Officer responses, be agreed;

 

(B)      in light of the responses received, the suggested amendments to the document be agreed; and

 

(C)      the Mead Lane Urban Design Framework be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document to the East Herts Local Plan, Second Review, April 2007 (Saved Policies).

 

(see also Minute 327)


Meeting: 22/10/2014 - District Planning Executive Panel (Item 12)

12 Mead Lane Urban Design Framework pdf icon PDF 128 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Consideration was given to a report presenting the main issues raised during the consultation on the draft Mead Lane Urban Design Framework (UDF).  The report also sought agreement that the proposed amendments be made, and that the UDF be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document to the East Herts Local Plan, Second Review, April 2007 (Saved Policies).

 

In response to Members’ questions, Officers advised that discussions with the County Council over education provision were ongoing and reference was made to the outcome of a recent planning application relating to Simon Balle School.  Although the UDF made reference to the general character of the area, its purpose was to provide a broad framework.  If adopted, it would be given significant weight in the planning application process.

 

The Panel supported the recommendations as now detailed.

 

RECOMMENDED – that (A) the issues raised during the public consultation on the draft Mead Lane Urban Design Framework, together with the Officer responses, be agreed;

 

(B)      in light of the responses received, the suggested amendments to the document be agreed; and

 

(C)      the Mead Lane Urban Design Framework be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document to the East Herts Local Plan, Second Review, April 2007 (Saved Policies).